PROSTATE FOCUS 
 
MARCH 2011

 


If you find any of our articles/comments helpful a method of donating is provided.  This will ensure the contination of this online edition of Prostate Focus. 
You do not need a Paypal account to donate - you can use your debit/credit card via Paypal secure payment method.

 

If this is inconvenient send a cheque direct to Prostate Help 2003 Ltd., LANGWORTH, LINCOLN, LN3 5DF.   Please mark the back of your cheque DONATION


Still Blind as a Bat.

But now I am as

Confused as a Kipper.

 

Well another month gone by.  My last test was 1.1 

Yes down as near as 50% as makes no difference.

Which means ?  What ? 

Any ideas ? I fully expected some sort of rise if only from the growth of BPH tissue.

When you consider that the man who discovered the PSA test Richard J. Ablin wishes that the authorities had not abused its use.  His words below:-

“Prostate-specific antigen testing does have a place. After treatment for prostate cancer, for instance, a rapidly rising score indicates a return of the disease. And men with a family history of prostate cancer should probably get tested regularly. If their score starts skyrocketing, it could mean cancer.

But these uses are limited. Testing should absolutely not be deployed to screen the entire population of men over the age of 50, the outcome pushed by those who stand to profit.

I never dreamed that my discovery four decades ago would lead to such a profit-driven public health disaster. The medical community must confront reality and stop the inappropriate use of P.S.A. screening. Doing so would save billions of dollars and rescue millions of men from unnecessary, debilitating treatments.”

Over the years, the PHA has attempted to put the other side of the coin in relation to PSA testing.  With various groups and wives and partners of men with or who have died from PC, here in the UK pushing and shouting for PSA screening for every man.  It really is a lesson to everyone to step back and check out the consequences of screening. Our articles in our paper edition and here on the web try to drive home the point, like Richard Ablin, but the PHA has always been a lone voice with very little support were it is counted.

I like to think we have helped many in regard to testing and not just the one or two who have written with thanks.

But back to me…….

Well obviously I have not had a rapidly rising PSA reading.  Not even a rising one…..

Did Mr Eaton totally destroy/remove all the cancer cells during the vapourisation ?

I have checked with a couple of medics for feedback.  One attempted to be constructive but I believe was a little out of his depth.  Another said

“That is truly excellent news. I‘m fairly certain this fall cannot be attributed to any conventional medicines but I guess you may be taking something for your prostate health – if so continue with it!”

Which is encouraging,  (although as I have not been taking any conventional medicines, as the man said we can rule that out.) but if I had been taking Casodex  (hormone treatment), for instance, then that would have blocked off the testosterone and would have hit the cancer and knocked the PSA down ? Of course I am assuming there are still cancer cells for the hormone treatment to be effective.

So at just what point in my campaign does that put me.  Stop, increase or just carry on…….

I think I will just carry on.  So it is bicarb and Vit C.  I trust by now that anyone who is seriously interested will have researched these two methods of treating PC.  Well any sort of cancer actually.

……….No I will go on the attack.  After all, I understand the best form of defence is attack so that is what I will do. I am sure any General will not allow a weakened enemy to reinforce and regroup but would take advantage of the setback of the opposition to strike forcefully !





So here goes. Reinforcements at the ready. Trained and honed. Big boots suitably shined, kit inspections all over and ready to ship out and to take on the enemy.

Just what is all this drawing mental pictures of troops and enemy about  ?

Well if you read any cancer book what you should find is - altering your mental attitude (visualisation) can be an important facet of treatment.  So altering your mind set from subserviance, fear, concern, etc. to aggression and positivity is the way to go.  Now although I do not have any of the former I feel that enforcing on my sub-self, the attitude I wish it to take in regard to any cancer cells which are around then I can lay back and let it get on with the task in hand !  I think it is called delegation !

 Apricot kernals.

Apricot what ?  Kernals.  The seed part of the apricot fruit.  I did cover this ‘cure’ yes I said cure, (What the H***, they are, whatever the authorities say or do they will only be compounding their own ignorance), in PHA newsletters over the last two decades.

But for those who are not sure here is a brief rundown and if you want to know more there are plenty of books on Amazon and articles on the web to keep you in bedtime reading for a good long time.  So we have apricot kernals which contain Laetrile (B17)… read on…

Laetrile, commonly known as Vitamin B-17 or Amygdalin, is a natural chemotherapeutic agent found in over 1,200 plants, particularly in the seeds of common fruits such as apricots, peaches, plums, and apples. It is a diglucocide with a cyanide radical that is highly "bio-accessible." This means that it penetrates through the cellular membrane reaching high intra-cellular concentrations easily. Cancer cells, no matter the type of cancer, are known as Trophoblasts (See Trophoblastic Thesis of Cancer). These cells contain an enzyme called Beta-glucosidase, also known as the unlocking enzyme. When Laetrile comes in contact with the enzyme beta-glucosidase, the Laetrile is broken down to form two molecules of glucose, one molecule of benzaldehyde and one molecule of hydrogen cyanide (HCN). Within the body, the cancer cell-and only the cancer cell-contains that enzyme. The key word here is that the HCN must be FORMED. It is not floating around freely in the Laetrile and then released. It must be manufactured. The enzyme beta-glucosidase, and only that enzyme, is capable of manufacturing the HCN from Laetrile thereby affecting the cancer cell-and only the cancer cell. If there are no cancer cells in the body, there is no beta-glucosidase. If there is no beta-gllucosidase, no HCN will be formed from the Laetrile. The normal cells in our organism contain an enzyme called Rodhanese which "neutralises" the Amygdalin. This enzyme does not allow the Amygdalin to release the cyanide. In this way, Amygdalin only serves as glucose to healthy cells providing energy. Malignant cells do not contain this enzyme. In the absence of Rodhanese, the Amygdalin is activated liberating the cyanide radical inside the malignant cell causing its destruction. Detoxification of cyanide occurs, therefore, in normal mammalian tissue through the action of Rhodanese, which, in the presence of sulphur-bearing compounds, converts free cyanide to thiocyanate, a perfectly non-toxic compound. The thiocyanate is excreted in the urine.

 

Here endeth todays lesson.

 

Philip


 

Inclusion of links is NOT an endorsement by the Prostate Help Association, nor do we guarantee any information you will find, other than our own.
We would remind everyone that they should discuss with their medical team all aspects of their condition
and then come to a decision in regard to the best treatment for their condition.

  Site Map